asadkhone_source

citation-network-analysis-of-retractions-in-molecular-biology-field-–-springer

Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field – Springer

—

by

Developer
in

References

  • Andersen, N., Corr, P. J., & Furnham, A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of H. J. Eysenck’s research output: Clarifying controversy. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, T., Partin, K., & Resnik, D. B. (2022). Authorship issues when articles are retracted due to research misconduct and then resubmitted. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28, 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 3(1), 361–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics-Theory and Experiment. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann-Cimenti, H., Szilagyi, I. S., & Sandner-Kiesling, A. R. (2016). Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1063–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. A., & Labbé, C. (2017). Striking similarities between publications from China describing single gene knockdown experiments in human cancer cell lines. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1471–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. A., Park, Y., West, R. A., Capes-Davis, A., Favier, B., Cabanac, G., & Labbé, C. (2021). The thin ret (raction) line: Biomedical journal responses to incorrect non-targeting nucleotide sequence reagents in human gene knockdown publications. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3513–3534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candal-Pedreira, C., Ruano-Ravina, A., Fernández, E., Ramos, J., Campos-Varela, I., & Pérez-Ríos, M. (2020). Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre-post study. BMJ Global Health, 5, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Hu, Z., Milbank, J., & Schultz, T. (2013). A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 234–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. M. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health. BMC Veterinary Research, 18, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal-Re, R., & Ayuso, C. (2019). Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018. Journal of Medical Genetics, 56, 734–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, Y. R. (1997). Structural modeling of network systems in citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 946–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faggion, C. M., Ware, R. S., Bakas, N., & Wasiak, J. (2018). An analysis of retractions of dental publications. Journal of Dentistry, 79, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17028–17033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Yuan, J., & Yang, L. (2020). An observation framework for retracted publications in multiple dimensions. Scientometrics, 125, 1445–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasco, P. E., Smith, B. B., Murray, A. W., Khurmi, N., Mueller, J. T., & Poterack, K. A. (2022). Context analysis of continued citation of retracted manuscripts published in anesthesiology journals. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 135, 1011–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbi, A., Fazeli-Varzaneh, M., Ghaderi-Azad, E., Ausloos, M., & Kozak, M. (2021). Retracted papers by Iranian authors: Causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations. Scientometrics, 126, 7351–7371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heibi, I., & Peroni, S. (2021). A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: The Wakefield 1998 et al’.s case. Scientometrics, 126, 8433–8470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinnerk, F-D. (2017). Journal that holds record for retracted papers also has a problem with editorial board members. Science News. https://www.science.org/content/article/journal-holds-record-retracted-papers-also-has-problem-editorial-board-members

  • Horbach, S., & Halffman, W. (2019). The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications. Scientometrics, 118, 339–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kai, K. (2018). Researcher at the center of an epic fraud remains an enigma to those who exposed him. Science News. https://www.science.org/content/article/researcher-center-epic-fraud-remains-enigma-those-who-exposed-him

  • Kamali, N., Rahimi, F., & Abadi, A. T. B. (2022). Learning from retracted papers authored by the highly cited Iran-affiliated researchers: Revisiting research policies and a key message to Clarivate analytics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khademizadeh, S., Danesh, F., Esmaeili, S., Lund, B., & Santos-d’Amorim, K. (2023). Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends. Accountability in Research, 16, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroki, T., & Ukawa, A. (2018). Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publication. Accountability in Research, 25(4), 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labbé, C., Cabanac, G., West, R. A., Gautier, T., Favier, B., & Byrne, J. A. (2020). Flagging incorrect nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical papers: To what extent does the leading publication format impede automatic error detection? Scientometrics, 124(2), 1139–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. J., Wang, C. L., Chen, D. Z., & Huang, M. H. (2022). Exploring perception of retraction based on mentioned status in post-retraction citations. Journal of Informetrics, 16, 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madlock-Brown, C. R., & Eichmann, D. (2015). The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco-Cuenca, G., Salvador-Olivan, J. A., & Arquero-Aviles, R. (2021). Fraud in scientific publications in the European union. An analysis through their retractions. Scientometrics, 126, 5143–5164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Neri, I., Pineda, C., & Sandoval, H. (2022). Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: A rapid scoping review. Clinical Rheumatology, 41, 2241–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, X. S., Deng, H., & Guo, X. Z. (2017). Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: An overview. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 93, 499–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharnhorst, A. (1998). Citation: Networks, science landscapes and evolutionary strategies—Comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., Ye, D., Hill, A. M., & Whitehorn, A. S. (2020). Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data. Scientometrics, 125, 2877–2913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, R. G., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2013). Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS ONE, 8(7), e68397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vet, P. E., & Nijveen, H. (2016). Propagation of errors in citation networks: A study involving the entire citation network of a widely cited paper published in, and later retracted from, the journal Nature. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1, 3–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer 46 program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature from open access journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 855–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. J., Shi, Q. L., Zhou, Q., Zhao, S. Y., Hou, R. Z., Lu, S. Y., Gao, X., Chen, Y. L., & Grp,. (2022). Retracted systematic reviews were continued to be frequently cited: A citation analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. F., Ding, Y., Zhang, C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2023). Too official to be effective: An empirical examination of unofficial information channel and continued use of retracted articles. Research Policy, 52, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Abraham, J., & Fu, H. Z. (2020). Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978–2017. Scientometrics, 125, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., & Fu, H. Z. (2022). Productivity patterns, collaboration and scientific careers of authors with retracted publications in clinical medicine. Scientometrics, 127, 1883–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Chen, J. J., Tollas, A., & Ni, C. Q. (2023). The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions. Journal of Informetrics, 17, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references