seismic-responses-evaluation-of-tall-tubular-structures-using-viscous-dampers-in-outriggers-under-far-fault-excitations-…-–-springer

Seismic responses evaluation of tall tubular structures using viscous dampers in outriggers under far fault excitations … – Springer

Abstract

Many investigations have sought to consider the seismic responses of tall buildings against different kinds of loads. However, the effect of the position of viscous dampers in outriggers has not yet been considered on seismic responses. Therefore, this study intends to investigate the aforementioned parameter on the seismic responses of tall tubular structures under far fault excitations through nonlinear time history analysis using OPENSEES software. To achieve this goal, nine models of 50, 60, and 70-story tall tubular structures with conventional outriggers and outriggers equipped with passive nonlinear viscous dampers (PNVDs) are considered under three time history functions taken from the PEER ground motion database and selected according to authentic guidelines. The structural geometries and details from a recent study are adopted to simulate the finite element models. Seismic responses, including drift, acceleration, and energy absorption, are evaluated and discussed for different positions of PNVDs. Results show that locating PNVDs diagonally inside the outrigger systems of 50-story buildings leads to a reduction in structural members’ seismic responses, while in 60 and 70-story structures, the structural members’ contribution mitigates when the PNVDs are located vertically between peripheral columns and outrigger systems. It is important to note that the drifts and accelerations of 50, 60, and 70-story buildings are maximally reduced to 25.56%, 27.40%, 74.05%, 64.98%, 36.88%, and 40.63%, respectively. Finally, it is concluded that choosing the accurate configuration of dampers in outrigger systems, which depends on structure heights and frequencies, is effective in reducing seismic responses to an acceptable range of advised guideline criteria.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kim HS, Lim YJ, Lee HL (2020) Optimum location of outrigger in tall buildings using finite element analysis and gradient-based optimization method. J Build Eng 31:101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohammadnejad M, Haji Kazemi H (2017) Dynamic response analysis of a combined system of framed tubed, shear core and outrigger-belt truss. Asian J Civ Eng 18:1211–1228

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamgar R, Rahgozar P (2019) Reducing static roof displacement and axial forces of columns in tall buildings based on obtaining the best locations for multi rigid belt truss outrigger systems. Asian J civil Eng 20(6):759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00142-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi H, Ho G, Joseph L, Mathias N (2012) Outrigger design for high-rise buildings. CTBUH Outrigger Working group, Council on Tall Building and urban Habitat, Chicago, USA.

  5. Rahgozar R, Rahgozar P (2014) (2014) Parametric stress distribution and displacement functions for tall buildings under lateral loads. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 23(1):22–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamgar R, Rahgozar P (2020) Optimum location for the belt truss system for minimum roof displacement of steel buildings subjected to critical excitation. Steel Compos Struct 37(4):463–479

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2017) Determination of optimum location for flexible outrigger systems in tall buildings with constant cross section consisting of framed tube, shear core, belt truss and outrigger system using energy. Int J steel struct 17(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-0172-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davari SM, Malekinejad M, Rahgozar R (2021) An approximate approach for the natural frequencies of tall building with trussed-tube system. Innov Infrastruct solute 6(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00418-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2020) seismic performance of outrigger braced system based on finite element and component mode synthesis methods. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng 44(4):1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00299-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takabatake H, Kitada Y, Takewaki I, Kishida A ( 2019) Simplified dynamic analysis of high-rise buildings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7185-1

  11. Amini M, Akbarpour A, Haji Kazemi H, Adibramezani M (2021) Mathematical formulation for determining lateral displacement of tubular frame and outriggers equipped with viscous dampers. Int J Integr Eng 13(1):201–217

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xing L, Gardoni P, Zhou Y, Zhang P (2023) optimal models of outrigger locations and damping parameters for combined energy dissipation outrigger systems subject to seismic and wind loads. J Build Eng 76(1):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y, Mc Farland DM, Wang Z, Spencer BF, Bergman LA (2010) Analysis of tall buildings with damped outriggers. J Struct Eng ASCE 136:1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amini M, Akbarpour A, Haji Kazemi H, Adibramezani M (2022) An innovative approach for evaluating mode shapes and natural frequencies of tubular frame and damped outriggers. Innovat Infrastruct Solut 7(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00634-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hooshmand M, Haji Kazemi H, Zareei SA (2023) Analytical evaluation on the behavior of diagrid tall steel buildings under far and near earthquakes with the approach of controlling serviceability and acceleration criteria. Innovat Infrastruct Solut 8(8):215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01173-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Husain M, Hassan H, Mohamed HA, Elgharbawy ES (2021) The seismic response of structural outrigger systems in tall buildings. J Appl Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-30837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xing L, Gardoni P, Zhan Y (2023) Fragility Estimates for high-rise buildings with outrigger systems under seismic and wind loads. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2227904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. AL-Subaihawi S, Kolay C, Marullo L, Ricles JM (2020) Assessment of wind-induced vibration mitigation in a tall building with damped outriggers using real-time hybrid simulations. Eng Struct 205:110044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sisson S, Mashnad M, Yeo DH (2022) Evaluation of DAD-ETABS procedure and software for the design of high-rise steel buildings for wind, National Institute of standards and technology, Gaithersburg, MD, NIST TN 2236. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2236

  20. Tiwary AK (2022) Different types of outrigger system in hige-rise buildings: a preliminary comparative seismic analysis in a 40-story RC building. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7:347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00946-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Samadi M, Jahan N (2021) Comparative study on the effect of outrigger on seismic response of tall building with braced and Wall. Core II: determining seismic design parameters. Struct Design Tall spec Build 30:e1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar MJ, Gupta SM (2023). Comparative study of time history analysis of outrigger and tube-ln-tube structures using ETABS. ln: Sil A, N Kontoni DP, Pancharathi RK (eds) Recent trends in civil engineering. Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4055-2_29

  23. Sun F, Yu R, Jila R (2022) Practical optimal design method for multi outrigger building structures under inter-story drift constraints. Adv Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332221127341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alavi A, Mele E, Rahgozar R, Farsangi EN, Takewaki L and Malaga-Chuquitaype C, (2021). Uniform deformation design of outrigger braced skyscrapers: a simplified method for the preliminary design stage. In structures (Vol. 31, pp. 395–405). https://doi.org/10.1016/i.istruc.2021.01.099

  25. Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2020) Seismic performance of outrigger-braced system based on finite element and component mode synthesis methods. Iran J Sci Technol Transact Civil Eng 44(4):1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00299-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamgar R, Tavakoli R, Rahgozar P, Jankowski R (2021) Application of discrete wavelet transform in seismic nonlinear analysis of soil-structure interaction problem. Earthq Spectra J. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020988027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang M, Nagarajaiah S, Sun F (2022) A novel crosswind mitigation strategy for tall buildings using negative stiffness damped outrigger systems. Struct Control Health Monit 29(9):e2988. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Onuralp Ozkılıc Y, Karalar M et al (2023) Shear performance of reinforced expansive concrete beams utilizing aluminium waste. J Market Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saeed A, Mohammed Najm M et al (2022) A comprehensive study on the effect of regular and staggered openings on the seismic performance of shear walls. J Build. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Emad W, Salih Mohammed A et al (2022) Prediction of concrete materials compressive strength using surrogate models. Res J Inst Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Taranath BS (2017) Tall building design, steel, concrete, and composite systems. Taylor & Francis, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2020) Optimal location of energy dissipation outrigger in high-rise building considering nonlinear soil-structure interaction effects. Periodic polytech civil Eng 64(3):887–903. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.14673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Constantinou, T. Soong, (1994) Passive energy dissipation systems for structural design and retrofit. in Multidisciplinary center for earthquake engineering research.

  34. ASCE/SEI 07 (2017), Minimum design loads and associated criteria for building and other structures. American society of civil Engineers, ASCE, Virginia, USA.

  35. Malekinejad M, Rahgozar R (2011) A simple analytic method for computing the natural frequencies and mode shapes of tall buildings. Appl Math Model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Birjand Branch, Birjand, 9717811111, Iran

    Ali Naseri & Mohsen Amini

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Hasan Haji Kazemi

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Amini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naseri, A., Amini, M. & Haji Kazemi, H. Seismic responses evaluation of tall tubular structures using viscous dampers in outriggers under far fault excitations. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 273 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01574-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01574-7

Keywords