A coalition of states had sought to place limits on Elon Musk’s operatives. A federal judge in Washington gave President Trump a victory for now when she declined on Tuesday to bar Elon Musk and his associates from ordering mass firings or having access to data at seven federal agencies. The judge, Tanya S. Chutkan of the Federal District Court, wrote that a coalition of 14 state attorneys general could not provide specific examples of how Mr. Musk’s team’s efforts would cause imminent or irreparable harm to the states or their residents. “The court is aware that DOGE’s unpredictable actions have resulted in considerable uncertainty and confusion for plaintiffs and many of their agencies and residents,” Judge Chutkan wrote, referring to the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which is tasked with carrying out Mr. Musk’s vision. But the mere possibility that “defendants may take actions that irreparably harm plaintiffs” was not enough to grant emergency relief, she said. Judge Chutkan nonetheless appeared to suggest that the lawsuit had a strong chance of succeeding with the benefit of additional evidence, which could be introduced later as litigation continues. “Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she wrote. The ruling by Judge Chutkan reflected the atmosphere of confusion surrounding the purpose and goals of Mr. Musk’s team, which judges in a number of court cases have repeatedly and unsuccessfully asked government lawyers to clarify. It also reflected what Judge Chutkan described as the considerable uncertainty about what future cuts and layoffs could result from Mr. Musk’s effort to shrink the federal work force, which has resulted in the termination of hundreds of federal contracts and thousands of workers in recent weeks. “The court can’t act based on media reports,” she said in a hearing on Monday. “We can’t do that.” The coalition of 14 states had argued in the case that Mr. Musk was essentially informing his process on the fly, steering decisions about how to reshape federal agencies based on the data his team was actively extracting. “The way in which DOGE and Mr. Musk have identified how to make cuts is through use and analysis of the agency data,” Anjana Samant, a deputy counsel at the New Mexico Department of Justice, said on Monday. “I don’t see how defendants can dispute that.” The states had sought a temporary restraining order to prevent Elon Musk or anyone on his efficiency team from combing through data at seven agencies: the Office of Personnel Management and the Education, Labor, Health and Human Services, Energy, Transportation and Commerce Departments. It also sought to prevent Mr. Musk’s operatives from “terminating, furloughing, or otherwise placing on involuntary leave” any employees who work at those agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency, which is not a department but a small team housed within the executive office of the president, regularly spotlights obscure grants and contracts on its website as examples of runaway spending that President Trump has given a greenlight to slash. But in the process, it has also pushed billions of dollars in cuts without explanation, and spurred personnel changes, including the firing or suspension of thousands of workers. The coalition of states suing described the effect of those cuts in a motion as “a classic pocketbook injury,” given the federal funding states could lose as Mr. Musk’s team continues to make changes. In the hearing on Monday, Judge Chutkan appeared to doubt whether it was possible to determine how that impact could be measured, absent clearer evidence about what the Musk team is doing. She pressed Ms. Samant to identify cases of “imminent harm,” asking for specific examples of critical programs that the Musk team may have already targeted like a “wrecking ball,” which would justify such a sweeping emergency injunction. Ms. Samant pointed specifically to reporting last week that the Education Department had moved to slash hundreds of millions of dollars in grants that fund education research that teachers and academics in New Mexico and other plaintiff states depend on. She also pointed to the impact of staff reductions at the Energy Department last week, which she said put residents of her state in danger, given the nuclear waste disposal facilities that the department oversees there. While several judges have already considered more limited restraining orders halting Musk team operations within individual agencies, the case before Judge Chutkan is unique in its focus on the Constitution’s appointments clause, which specifies which officials can be appointed by the executive branch without the consent of the Senate. The states argued in their lawsuit that Mr. Trump had violated the clause by granting broad powers to Mr. Musk. On Monday, Ms. Samant stressed that the lawsuit was squarely focused on Mr. Musk and the sweeping authority he had claimed over federal agency heads, not any changes that agencies decide to make on their own. “Mr. Musk is not a principal officer of the United States within the meaning of the appointments clause of the Constitution; he occupies a role the president made up, not one Congress created,” the attorneys general wrote in a motion. The suit was filed by the attorneys general in New Mexico, Arizona, Michigan, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont. Attorneys for the government on Monday disputed the notion that Mr. Musk had been given any extraordinary control or had personally influenced any decisions. They sought to reinforce that claim with a declaration from Joshua Fisher, the director of the White House’s Office of Administration, filed on Monday. Although Mr. Musk has taken a leading role in the federal downsizing efforts, Mr. Fisher stated that he has “no actual or formal authority to make government decisions” and is not the legal head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Justice Department attorneys also argued that some of the states who joined the lawsuit had failed to show that they had been harmed by anything Mr. Musk had done so far. “An appointment clause claim is entirely about somebody occupying an office and using the trappings of that office to wield sovereign power,” Harry Graver, an attorney for the Justice Department, said. “Nowhere have my friends offered a shred of anything, nor could they, to show that Elon Musk has any formal or actual authority to make any government decision himself.”
Howard Lutnick, nominee to be Secretary of Commerce, speaks during a Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation meeting in Washington, last month. The Senate on Tuesday voted 51 to 45 to confirm Howard Lutnick to be President Trump’s commerce secretary, putting in place one of the administration’s top economic officials who will help oversee an agenda around tariffs and protectionism. Mr. Lutnick, who was the chief executive of the financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald, became a central economic adviser to Mr. Trump over the past year and led his transition team. He has defended tariffs as a tool to protect U.S. industries from international competition, promoted lower corporate taxes and called for an expansion of energy production. As commerce secretary, Mr. Lutnick will take on a broad portfolio that includes defending U.S. business interests worldwide and overseeing restrictions on technology exports to countries like China. At his confirmation hearing last month, Mr. Lutnick said he would take a tough stance on the department’s oversight of technology sales to China and back up U.S. export controls with the threat of tariffs. He said the recent artificial intelligence technology released by the Chinese start-up DeepSeek had been underpinned by Meta’s open platform and chips sold by the U.S. company Nvidia. “We need to stop helping them,” Mr. Lutnick said of China, adding, “I’m going to be very strong on that.” As the United States resumes economic negotiations with the country, Mr. Lutnick is expected to play a central role. Mr. Trump said the new commerce secretary would oversee the work of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, which is traditionally the hub of trade policy. Mr. Lutnick will assume that responsibility as Mr. Trump has already taken steps to upend the global trading system. The president has threatened tariffs on Canada and Mexico, imposed tariffs on China and initiated a process to begin imposing so-called reciprocal tariffs on all U.S. trading partners. The Commerce Department will work with other federal agencies to determine tariff rates for other countries. Mr. Lutnick will also be responsible for overseeing and potentially overhauling programs that were top priorities for the Biden administration. Those include subsidies to U.S. chip manufacturers under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act and an effort to provide broadband internet access to at least 6.25 million households and locations across the country. Mr. Lutnick, who is a wealthy investor, has a network of ties that could raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest as he leads the way on government policies that could significantly affect businesses and markets, potentially enriching former customers or partners. For instance, he has financial interests in the mining industry in Greenland through Cantor Fitzgerald. Cantor has invested in Critical Metals, a company that has proposed mining metals and minerals in Greenland as soon as 2026. Mr. Trump has repeatedly proposed purchasing Greenland, which is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Demark. A financial disclosure filing that Mr. Lutnick submitted last month showed executive positions he has held or holds in more than 800 individual firms. It also revealed that he received more than $350 million in income, distributions and bonuses in the past two years from his network of financial services and real estate firms. Mr. Lutnick, who worked on Wall Street for decades, gained national attention when many of the employees at Cantor Fitzgerald, the brokerage firm where he was the president and chief executive, died in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
Half of deported migrants sent to Panama from U.S. agree to return to their home countries, Panama says. More than 300 migrants deported from the United States last week are being held at the Decapolis Hotel in Panama City. Federico Rios for The New York Times Nearly a week after the United States sent roughly 300 migrants from around the world to Panama on military deportation flights, officials in Panama said on Tuesday that more than 170 had agreed to be deported to their countries of origin. The migrants are illegal U.S. border crossers whose countries of origin — mainly in Asia, the Middle East and Africa — either do not accept deportation flights or take them sparingly. The Trump administration has been pressing countries in Latin America to accept those migrants as it steps up deportations amid a crackdown on unauthorized immigration. To date, only Panama and Costa Rica are known to have accepted such migrants. In Panama, the migrants have been locked in a soaring, glass-paneled downtown hotel, the Decapolis Hotel Panama. Reporters from The New York Times managed to speak to several people there — including some from Iran and China — who said they had left their countries for the United States because their lives were in danger. Around 150 migrants who had not agreed to be deported would be relocated from the hotel to a camp near the jungle known as the Darién Gap, according to Panama’s security minister, Frank Ábrego. He said at a news conference on Tuesday that the migrants would remain at the camp, San Vicente, until they were offered asylum in a third country “where they felt safe.” Mr. Ábrego said that no one had applied for asylum in Panama. Panamanian authorities have not permitted the deportees to leave the hotel, and a lawyer seeking to represent several migrants, Jenny Soto Fernández, told The Times that officials had blocked her from entering the building at least four times. In an interview, Ms. Soto said that several migrants from Iran had asked for her help in applying for refugee status in Panama. “I have all the legal documents ready,” she said, adding that she was “still not able to get to” the people. Mr. Ábrego said at the news conference that his government was keeping the migrants in the hotel in an effort to “guarantee security and peace for Panamanian citizens.” Last week, Panama’s deputy foreign minister, Carlos Ruiz-Hernández, described the migrants as “having no criminal records.” Mr. Ábrego said that, of the more than 170 migrants who had signed orders authorizing their deportation, around 20 were expected to depart for their home countries in the next week. He said one deportee in the group, from Ireland, had already returned home. Questions at Tuesday’s news conference focused largely on the accounts of migrants in the hotel that were gathered by The Times. Asked by reporters about a deportee’s suicide attempt, which was recounted to Times reporters by several people, Mr. Ábrego said he had no prior knowledge of it. He said a migrant who was said to have broken a leg trying to escape from the hotel had twisted an ankle on a staircase. Mr. Ábrego repeatedly pointed to the United Nations agencies that are charged with responding to the needs of the migrants deported to Panama under Panama’s agreements with the United States: the International Organization for Migration, or I.O.M., and U.N.H.C.R., or the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, also known as the U.N. Refugee Agency. The security minister said the deportees were only in temporary custody of Panamanian officials. “Custody sounds bad,” he said. “They’re under our protection.” Annie Correal reported from Mexico City and Julie Turkewitz from Bogotá, Colombia. Alex E. Hernández contributed reporting from Panama City.
One of Trump’s top campaign strategists is helping an Albanian politician accused of corruption. Chris LaCivita, who helped run President Trump’s campaign, at a rally in Grand Rapids, Mich., last July. Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times Chris LaCivita, a Republican strategist who helped run President Trump’s campaign, is advising a conservative opposition party in Albania headed by a politician who has faced accusations of corruption from the State Department and prosecutors at home. Mr. LaCivita, who became an adviser to a pro-Trump nonprofit group after the U.S. presidential election in November, is among a handful of Trump advisers who have been pursuing political consulting work around the world for politicians who cast themselves as populists or immigration critics in the Trump mold. Mr. LaCivita is working for the Democratic Party of Albania ahead of the country’s parliamentary elections in May, when it will try to overtake the governing left-wing Socialist Party. In text messages to The New York Times, Mr. LaCivita characterized his work as an extension of his assistance to Mr. Trump. The leader of the Democratic Party of Albania is Sali Berisha, a former president and prime minister who is facing corruption charges in Albania in connection with a property deal. The Biden administration imposed sanctions on Mr. Berisha in 2021 for “significant corruption,” according to a statement from former Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, who accused him of misappropriating public funds and using his power to enrich his allies and family. Mr. LaCivita argued that the accusations against Mr. Berisha were politically motivated, and suggested the Albanian politician’s experience aligned with that of Mr. Trump. “It’s a natural fit — beating a Socialist who’s a pawn and puppet of the Soros family,” Mr. LaCivita said, evoking unsubstantiated claims by Mr. Berisha that the Democratic megadonor George Soros was behind the sanctions. Mr. Berisha has indicated that he intends to ask the Trump administration to reconsider the State Department’s sanctions. Mr. Berisha has used his party’s hiring of Mr. LaCivita to link himself to Mr. Trump, though the U.S. president has not signaled support for a preferred party in the parliamentary elections. Mr. Berisha also has sought to distinguish himself from the governing party by vowing that if the opposition wins, it will not renew Albania’s agreement to accept migrants from Italy. Sali Berisha, the leader of the Democratic Party of Albania, has used his hiring of Mr. LaCivita to link himself to President Trump. Strategists for winning presidential campaigns have long marketed their services abroad. There is often high demand for consultants with ties to the new U.S. president from foreign politicians seeking to portray themselves as the favored candidate of Washington, which can be an advantage in many parts of the world. But Mr. LaCivita, who appeared this month with Mr. Berisha at a news conference in Albania, said he would not approach the Trump administration on behalf of Mr. Berisha or his party. “I don’t lobby,” Mr. LaCivita said. “I do campaigns, and that’s what I am doing — pretty straightforward.” After Mr. Trump was elected in November, Mr. LaCivita became involved in a variety of enterprises. He accepted a position on the board of advisers of the government relations firm Michael Best Strategies, which lobbies for corporate clients including T-Mobile and the cryptocurrency company Ripple Labs, though he did not register to lobby himself. Mr. LaCivita also joined the global advisory council of the cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. And he teamed with other Trump-linked consultants, including Paul Manafort, who served as chairman of Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign, to pitch political consulting services to far-right politicians around the world. Mr. LaCivita would not say whether other consultants were involved in the Albania work, and several of them did not respond to requests for comment. He also would not say whether he had signed on any other foreign clients, but suggested that he had been traveling widely.
Trump may name Alice Johnson, whom he once pardoned, to be his ‘pardon czar.’ Alice Marie Johnson at the White House in 2020. In 2018, President Trump issued a commutation to Ms. Johnson, who had been locked up in an Alabama federal prison since 1996. Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times President Trump’s advisers are considering Alice Marie Johnson, who was serving a life sentence for a drug conviction when the president commuted her sentence during his first term, to be the “pardon czar,” according to three people familiar with the discussions. It was not immediately clear what the role would entail, but Ms. Johnson, at the end of Mr. Trump’s first term, said she wanted to work on behalf of people she believed should be considered for clemency. Ms. Johnson’s appointment has not been finalized, and like many things in Mr. Trump’s world, plans could change. When reached by phone, Ms. Johnson declined to comment. A White House spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. Ms. Johnson, whose case was originally brought to Mr. Trump’s attention by Kim Kardashian, has become a vocal supporter of the president. Some of Mr. Trump’s advisers see her as being politically helpful to him over the years; during the 2020 presidential race, the Trump campaign featured her in a Super Bowl ad in an effort to reach Black voters. Still, her case, and the new role of “pardon czar,” show how Mr. Trump’s approach to criminal justice reform is rife with contradictions. He signed the bipartisan First Step Act, which aimed to reduce prison sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, during his first term, then told advisers privately soon afterward that he regretted it, according to multiple officials working with him at the time. During his 2024 campaign, he called for shooting thieves who steal from drugstores and for the death penalty for drug traffickers and dealers. Then, in one of his first acts as president in his second term, he issued a grant of clemency to all of the nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 — violent and nonviolent alike. Ms. Johnson’s case was seen as an example of draconian sentencing laws that disproportionately affected nonviolent offenders, particularly women and members of minority communities. Her case became a rallying cry for reform after a viral video of Ms. Johnson speaking from prison caught the attention of Ms. Kardashian. Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who was then a presidential adviser, arranged a meeting between Ms. Kardashian and Mr. Trump in May 2018 — on Ms. Johnson’s 63rd birthday — and Ms. Kardashian pleaded her case. Mr. Trump commuted Ms. Johnson’s sentence one week later, freeing her from prison. He then issued a full pardon during his 2020 re-election campaign, which wiped the conviction from her record. Mr. Trump’s decision faced opposition within his administration and among some allies. Ms. Johnson had been locked up in an Alabama federal prison since 1996 after being sentenced to life plus 25 years in prison as a first-time, nonviolent offender. She had been charged with cocaine possession and money laundering in a drug conspiracy case. Mr. Trump and Ms. Johnson celebrating the First Step Act, which aimed to reduce prison sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, at the White House in 2019. A single mother of five in Memphis, she had a history of gambling, unemployment, bankruptcy and foreclosure before becoming involved in a drug ring. She was arrested in 1993 as part of an operation that transported cocaine from Houston to Memphis, relaying coded messages between conspirators. She also purchased a house with a down payment that she structured with three separate money orders under the $10,000 reporting limit. Under mandatory sentencing rules, she was given a life term without parole, even though she had never sold drugs. Several co-defendants who testified against her were sentenced to probation or terms of up to 10 years. Ms. Johnson had served two decades of the sentence, during which she became a grandmother and great-grandmother, took educational and vocational programs, volunteered to help sick and dying prisoners, and helped coordinate the prison’s Special Olympics. Mr. Trump cited Ms. Johnson’s case, among others, at the signing ceremony for the First Step Act. “Alice Johnson — I let her out. She was in jail for 22 years. She had another 28 years. And the crime was, let’s say — I think most of you would agree — was not worthy of a 50-year term in prison,” he said. “And she came out, and I’ll never forget the look on her face,” Mr. Trump said, going on to describe watching her be embraced by her family. “I said, what a beautiful thing that is.” First Step was one of the most consequential criminal justice reform bills in decades. It combined new funding for anti-recidivism programs, the expansion of early-release credits for prisoners and the reduction of certain mandatory minimum sentences. The bill would help shape the experiences of tens of thousands of current inmates and future offenders. Thousands were released from federal custody after its passage. In a November 2024 television interview, Ms. Johnson said that after her release she personally submitted over 100 petitions to the White House after Mr. Trump asked her to compile a list of people she believed deserved clemency. “I’m so blessed to be free myself,” she said. “The work continues. I can’t help but advocate for people who are incarcerated, because I’m really one of them. I’m just a free one of them.”
Trump’s cuts could make parks and forests more dangerous, employees say. At least 3,000 employees have been laid off across the United States Forest Service and the National Park Service. Chanell Stone for The New York Times Public lands in the United States have long been considered a national treasure. But, since Thursday, at least 3,000 employees have been laid off across the United States Forest Service and the National Park Service, part of a wave of Trump administration cuts to the federal work force. Together, these agencies oversee 278 million acres of land, roughly the size of Texas and Montana combined. With whole teams slashed and fewer staff to provide basic functions like cleaning up trails, emptying pit toilets, carrying out trash and staffing visitors centers, employees say these vast public lands are in danger of falling into disarray. Current and former employees of these agencies say their departments were already underfunded and understaffed before the job cuts, particularly as climate change has begun to significantly transform America’s natural areas. Over the weekend, I spoke to nearly a dozen employees who were terminated or saw their job offers rescinded, along with managers forced to deliver those notices from the Forest Service and the National Park Service. Most had been employed by the federal government for years or even decades. Some of the cuts could threaten the local economies and safety of nearby towns, the employees say. Among those whose jobs were eliminated were river and wilderness rangers, scientists who help keep forests healthy to minimize fire danger, analysts, attorneys and administrators. Many were trained to assist firefighters, possessing skills that are required each summer as climate change causes bigger and more severe fires. The workers had a lot in common: Most lived in small towns, most had no backup plan when they were let go and all expressed that they had worked for these agencies because they loved public lands and wanted to be of service to their communities. In a statement, a spokesperson for the Agriculture Department, which oversees the Forest Service, said the agency made “the difficult decision to release about 2,000 probationary, nonfirefighting employees.”
Brooke Rollins, the agriculture secretary, “is committed to preserving essential safety positions and will ensure that critical services remain uninterrupted,” the spokesperson said. The Park Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.S. Forest Service workers hanging a “No Entry” sign last June in the Los Padres National Forest after an evacuation order was issued northwest of Los Angeles. Philip Cheung for The New York Times Kate White, 29, lost her position as a wilderness ranger outside Seattle on Saturday after six years of seasonal work and 20 months of permanent employment with the U.S. Forest Service. She and her six co-workers took care of 500 miles of popular trails crisscrossing the Cascade Mountains. In a single season, she said, they monitored 70 backcountry toilets, carried out 600 pounds of trash and disposed of more than a thousand piles of human waste. This weekend, most of her co-workers also lost their jobs. Just one is left, which means just one staff member has the primary duty of patrolling 340,000 acres of wilderness, White said. Many workers in these agencies, outside of full-time firefighting, carry what’s called a red card, which means they’re trained to assist in wildland firefighting. Without those personnel, it will be more challenging to manage the increased risk of wildfire under climate change. Another employee who had a job offer rescinded at Mount Rainier National Park worried over visitor safety in the mountains. “Large areas of the alpine terrain are going to be unstaffed and inaccessible for long periods of time,” the employee said. An employee at a national forest in California said the cuts, plus unfilled roles, meant their particular forest would go into the summer with 80 percent fewer staff members overall, not including full-time firefighters. Both employees asked to remain anonymous out of fear of being terminated or not being rehired by the U.S. government. On Friday morning, Stacy Ramsey, 49, was monitoring a section of the Buffalo National River, a 135-mile waterway in northern Arkansas managed by the National Park Service, when she saw an email pop up on her phone with a headline that included the word “termination.” She was still in shock when, minutes later, she received a text to return to headquarters. There, the division chiefs, some crying, gathered in a conference room to tell her the firing was effective immediately. “They looked like someone had died,” Ramsey recalled the next day. She’d spent three years in a contract position, working weekends while holding down a second full-time job just to get her foot in the door. She’d become the park’s only year-round river ranger last March. Ramsey had grown up along the Buffalo in Searcy County, one of the poorest parts of Arkansas. She made $39,000 a year, a pay cut from her previous job teaching middle school, but just enough to cover her mortgage and bills. In the last few years, Ramsey noticed the river was changing, which she attributed to more extreme weather under a warming planet. Last summer, an extended drought caused four miles of the river to dry up, killing hundreds of fish. Major floods have become more common, eroding the banks and making the river wider and shallower. Floods also wash in trees, creating dangerous culverts called strainers. She said these events can increase dangers for park visitors. Her job as a river ranger was to keep them safe: She monitored the waterway, talked to visitors and issued warnings for parts of the river that could put them at risk. “If no one is there to educate, it increases the risk of someone getting hurt on the river,” Ramsey said. A National Park ranger swept a sidewalk at the Jimmy Carter National Historical Park in Plains, Ga., last month. Workers I spoke with said there will simply be fewer people to educate visitors about the wilderness. In 2022, Jillian Greene, a 24-year-old wilderness ranger, moved to Montana for a seasonal position with the U.S. Forest Service. She fell in love with the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness, a region of steep peaks draped in rapidly melting glaciers. She lost her job last week.
In her position, she spent five to eight days at a time backpacking into high elevations to clear trails and clean up campsites. A decade ago, five wilderness rangers covered roughly a third of the nearly one million acre wilderness over the summer season; last year there were two, including Greene. This year, unless staff are rehired, there won’t be any.
Greene said she worried about an increase in potentially dangerous encounters between visitors and bears and about fewer hands to put out untended campfires. “I’m so scared for the future of public lands,” Greene said. “It’s been a really emotional weekend.”
• None A National Park Guide Was Flying Home From a Work Trip. She Was Fired Midair.
• None Forest Service Layoffs and Frozen Funds Increase the Risk From Wildfires. As Trump targets research, scientists share grief and resolve to fight At the annual gathering in Boston this past week of one of America’s oldest scientific societies, the discussions touched on threats to humankind: runaway artificial intelligence, toxic “forever chemicals,” the eventual end of the universe. But the most urgent threats for many scientists were the ones aimed at them, as the Trump administration slashes the federal scientific work force and cuts back on billions of dollars in funding for research at universities. — Raymond Zhong A Texas county is taking steps to declare a state of emergency and seek federal assistance over farmland contaminated with harmful “forever chemicals,” as concerns grow over the safety of fertilizer made from sewage. Johnson County, south of Fort Worth, has been roiled since county investigators found high levels of chemicals called PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, at two cattle ranches in the county in 2023. The county says the PFAS, also known as forever chemicals because they don’t break down in the environment, came from contaminated fertilizer used on a neighboring farm. PFAS, which are used in everyday items like nonstick cookware and stain-resistant carpets, have been found to increase the risk of certain types of cancer and can cause birth defects, developmental delays in children and other health harms. —Hiroko Tabuchi
• None Brazil has begun major raids into illegal logging operations in the Amazon, Reuters reports.
• None The Guardian reports that Trump’s federal funding freeze could hurt a recent solar energy boom in Republican states. Thanks for being a subscriber. Read past editions of the newsletter here. If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here. Browse all of our subscriber-only newsletters here. And follow The New York Times on Instagram, Threads, Facebook and TikTok at @nytimes. Reach us at climateforward@nytimes.com. We read every message, and reply to many!
Andrew Mangum for The New York Times Jim Jones, the director of the Food and Drug Administration’s food division, resigned on Monday, citing what he called “indiscriminate” layoffs that would make it “fruitless for him to continue.” In his resignation letter, Mr. Jones estimated that 89 people of the 2,000 in his division were fired over the weekend, many of them freshly hired to do more in-depth work on chemical safety to protect the nation’s food supply. “I was looking forward to working to pursue the department’s agenda of improving the health of Americans by reducing diet-related chronic disease and risks from chemicals in food,” Mr. Jones wrote in the letter submitted to Sara Brenner, the acting commissioner of the F.D.A. But the Trump administration’s “disdain for the very people” who would do that work gave him no choice but to depart, he said. Mr. Jones also singled out Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the newly appointed secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, for criticizing the F.D.A. as being too beholden to the industries it oversees and for vowing to to dismiss the agency’s nutrition staff. “The secretary’s comments impugning the integrity of the food staff, asserting they are corrupt based on falsities, is a disservice to everyone,” Mr. Jones wrote in the letter. His resignation was first reported in the Food Fix newsletter, which reports on news in the food industry. Mr. Jones and the F.D.A. did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The food division regulates some additives, like artificial colorings and dyes. It also plays a role in investigating outbreaks of food borne illness.The F.D.A. also funds and participates in inspections of food and infant formula processing facilities in the U.S. and abroad. The food division’s staff members were among about 700 people fired from the F.D.A. over the weekend. People who were let go by email said their supervisors were not aware of the cuts and had no say in them. In his resignation letter, Mr. Jones described the staff members who were laid off as having fresh education and experience in food safety work who would “represent the future of the agency.” Those workers included people with specialized skills in infant formula safety and food safety response. In early 2022, the division came under fiery criticism in the wake of an infant formula scandal, that began after some babies contracted infections from a deadly bacteria that was also discovered at a dilapidated plant in Michigan. The plant was shut down for a time, setting off a mass shortage of infant formula. Mr. Jones, whose background is in chemical regulation at the Environmental Protection Agency, was brought into the agency in 2023 as a reformer. During his tenure at the F.D.A., Mr. Jones reorganized the food division, improving the structure to bring down barriers between people who inspect food facilities and those who do more scientific safety work. He also created an office of food chemical safety and made it equal to an office that addresses bacteria like salmonella, listeria or E. coli, said Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit advocacy organization focused on reducing chemical exposures. “Our food will be less safe,” Mr. Faber said. “That’s the take-home. There are few leaders as experienced as Jim Jones. And we’ll have fewer staff who will have to learn everything Jim’s learned since he’s inherited this job.” Federal food safety efforts in recent months have still lagged behind action in states, though, with California beating the F.D.A. to make some key food-safety changes. California required disclosure of heavy metal levels in infant foods and passed a landmark ban on some food additives, including Red Dye No. 3 in 2023. The F.D.A. followed with a similar ban just weeks ago.